World!Of Numbers | |||
The Nine Digits Page 7 with some Ten Digits (pandigital) exceptions | |||
Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 |
When I use the term ninedigital in these articles I always refer to a strictly zeroless pandigital (digits from 1 to 9 each appearing just once).
Topic 7.14 [ August 26, 2024 ]
Ninedigital triplet sums, their reversals and sums of their squares.
Here are four solutions of ninedigital triplets that when reversed their sums are both equal to the same value, for all four equations!
\(\bbox[#defade,3px,border:1px solid]{618+294+753}\Leftarrow\) reversal of \(\Rightarrow\bbox[lavender,3px,border:1px solid]{357+492+816}=1665\)
\(\bbox[#defade,3px,border:1px solid]{639+174+852}\Leftarrow\) reversal of \(\Rightarrow\bbox[lavender,3px,border:1px solid]{258+471+936}=1665\)
\(\bbox[#defade,3px,border:1px solid]{159+834+672}\Leftarrow\) reversal of \(\Rightarrow\bbox[lavender,3px,border:1px solid]{276+438+951}=1665\)
\(\bbox[#defade,3px,border:1px solid]{879+654+132}\Leftarrow\) reversal of \(\Rightarrow\bbox[lavender,3px,border:1px solid]{231+456+978}=1665\)
But that is not all. Let us square the triplets on both sides and note that each equation add to the same value, yet the sums are different for each equations.
\(\bbox[#defade,3px,border:1px solid]{618^2+294^2+753^2}\Leftarrow\) reversal of \(\Rightarrow\bbox[lavender,3px,border:1px solid]{357^2+492^2+816^2}=1035369\)
\(\bbox[#defade,3px,border:1px solid]{639^2+174^2+852^2}\Leftarrow\) reversal of \(\Rightarrow\bbox[lavender,3px,border:1px solid]{258^2+471^2+936^2}=1164501\)
\(\bbox[#defade,3px,border:1px solid]{159^2+834^2+672^2}\Leftarrow\) reversal of \(\Rightarrow\bbox[lavender,3px,border:1px solid]{276^2+438^2+951^2}=1172421\)
\(\bbox[#defade,3px,border:1px solid]{879^2+654^2+132^2}\Leftarrow\) reversal of \(\Rightarrow\bbox[lavender,3px,border:1px solid]{231^2+456^2+978^2}=1217781\)
Ain't that surprisingly beautiful!
Beyond the ninedigital aspect there is more to discover in the image at → Autour du nombre 159
But there is more to discover. Multiplying the full concatenated ninedigital triplets of the first and third line and the multiplication of their reversals
yield the same results!
\(\Large{\bbox[#defade,3px,border:1px solid]{618294753}*\bbox[#defade,3px,border:1px solid]{159834672} \Leftarrow}\) reversals of \(\Large{\Rightarrow\bbox[lavender,3px,border:1px solid]{357492816}*\bbox[lavender,3px,border:1px solid]{276438951} = 98824939045076016}\)
Let that sink in for a while and you'll enjoy it all the more!
Topic 7.13 [ August 14, 2024 ]
Ninedigitals 123456789 and 987654321 hiding
in the decimal expansion of squares.
Here is the smallest example for substring \(123456789\)
and a few larger examples (there is no 'largest' one)
A much longer list can be found in the webarchive at https://web.archive.org/web/20040909153906/http://blue.kakiko.com/mmrmmr/htm/eqtn19.html
Note that some entries are doubled. Can someone find out who was the creator of these webpages.
Here is the smallest example for substring \(987654321\)
and a few larger examples (there is no 'largest' one)
A much longer list can be found in the webarchive at https://web.archive.org/web/20040909153910/http://blue.kakiko.com/mmrmmr/htm/eqtn20.html
Note that some entries are doubled. Can someone find out who was the creator of these webpages.
Can you find such a square where the root also contains \(123456789\) or \(987654321\) in its decimal expansion ? Can you find such a square where both ninedigitals (\(123456789\) & \(987654321\)) are present in the decimal expansion without overlapping? |
Topic 7.12 [ February 28, 2024 ]
Ninedigits Squared and Ninedigits Cubed
The result in both cases is the same \(\large\bbox[white,3px,border:1px blue solid]{2025}\)
Topic 7.11 [ September 2, 2022 ]
A follow up from WONplate 26 (some properties of 69696)
by Alexandru Petrescu (email)
In a contribution to WONplate 26 \(\bbox[#defade,5px,border:2px solid green]{69696 * palindrome = {nine-}~or~pandigital}\) I showed the next relation:
Now I went looking for a similar pattern \(\bbox[#defade,5px,border:2px solid green]{abcba * abba = ninedigital}\) and I found only one other number, namely:
Another pattern \(\bbox[#defade,5px,border:2px solid green]{abcba * abba = palindrome}\) produces 31 solutions.
1 10001 * 1001 = 10011001 2 10101 * 1001 = 10111101 3 10201 * 1001 = 10211201 4 10301 * 1001 = 10311301 5 10401 * 1001 = 10411401 6 10501 * 1001 = 10511501 7 10601 * 1001 = 10611601 8 10701 * 1001 = 10711701 9 10801 * 1001 = 10811801 10 10901 * 1001 = 10911901 11 11011 * 1111 = 12233221 12 11111 * 1111 = 12344321 13 11211 * 1111 = 12455421 14 11311 * 1111 = 12566521 15 11411 * 1111 = 12677621 16 11511 * 1111 = 12788721 17 11611 * 1111 = 12899821 18 12021 * 1221 = 14677641 19 12121 * 1221 = 14799741 20 20002 * 2002 = 40044004 21 20102 * 2002 = 40244204 22 20202 * 2002 = 40444404 23 20302 * 2002 = 40644604 24 20402 * 2002 = 40844804 25 21012 * 2112 = 44377344 26 21112 * 2112 = 44588544 27 21212 * 2112 = 44799744 28 30003 * 3003 = 90099009 29 30103 * 3003 = 90399309 30 30203 * 3003 = 90699609 31 30303 * 3003 = 90999909 |
[ September 6, 2022 ]
Alexandru explored many more patterns. Hereunder is an example
whereby a long multiplication with binary looking palindromic numbers leads to a palindrome where all ten digits are present.
1000010100001 * 10000100001 * 100000001 * 1000001 * 10001 * 101 = 1010122323456667799998999977666543232210101
The sequence is generated by abcdefgfedcba ➜ abcdefedcba ➜ abcdedcba ➜ abcdcba ➜ abcba ➜ aba.
We obtain the next term by deleting in the previous term the digits marked in red until we arrive at 'aba'.
Topic 7.10 [ August 28, 2022 ]
An interesting relation between four pandigital numbers
by Alexander R. Povolotsky (email)
Alexander likes to share the following relation he found between these four pandigitals :
This is quite remarkable! The outcome even wants to remind us that each pandigital has ten digits.
But part of the magic disappears when you write it out using their resp. primefactors.
You will notice that almost all factors cancel each other out just to leave 2 * 5.
I wonder if there exists a ninedigital analogue formula with a quotient of 9 of course ?
Alexander replies [ August 29, 2022 ]
“Speaking regarding one pair of ninedigits, there's no pair, which ratio yields 9 but I could offer you the pair, which ratio gives 8.
Perhaps someone could write a program to see whether there are existing (single or multiple) pairs, which ratios yield integer outcome...”
Related topic WONplate 114
Alexandru Petrescu found the four ninedigitals analogue formula with a quotient of 9 [ August 31, 2022 ]
I felt that there are many solutions involving two pairs of ninedigital (d1,d2) and (d3,d4).
I tried to find the pairs for which:
I found 162 pairs for (d1,d2) respectively 2212 pairs for (d3,d4).
Combining them we have 358344 solutions. One of them being:
Applying the same idea for pandigitals, using:
produces 6480 pairs for (d1,d2) respectively 7312 pairs for (d3,d4).
Combining them we obtain 47381760 solutions. One of them being:
So Povolotsky's relation is not at all unique...
Topic 7.9 [ August 22, 2022 ]
Route 1 from ninedigitals to palindromes via sum of 'powers of primes'
Route 2 from ninedigitals to ninedigitals via sum of 'powers of primes'
by Alexandru Petrescu (email)
In both cases the vehicle is this formula \(s = \sum_{i=1}^9(prime(v_i)^i) \)
Let a=v1v2v3v4v5v6v7v8v9 a ninedigital.
Note that prime(1)=2, prime(2)=3, prime(3)=5, prime(4)=7, prime(5)=11, prime(6)=13, prime(7)=17, prime(8)=19 and prime(9)=23.
ROUTE 1 (8 ninedigitals found) Worked Out Example
359678124 51 + 112 + 233 + 134 + 175 + 196 + 27 + 38 + 79 5 + 121 + 12167 + 28561 + 1419857 + 47045881 + 128 + 6561 + 40353607
88866888
ROUTE 2 (8 ninedigitals found) Worked Out Example
438769251 71 + 52 + 193 + 174 + 135 + 236 + 37 + 118 + 29 7 + 25 + 6859 + 83521 + 371293 + 148035889 + 2187 + 214358881 + 512
362859174
a | s | |
1 | 438769251 | 362859174 |
2 | 529468713 | 459723816 |
3 | 547198362 | 869315742 |
4 | 594872163 | 819235764 |
5 | 873569412 | 149265738 |
6 | 917258463 | 865719342 |
7 | 945672831 | 895713426 |
8 | 963574821 | 895431276 |
Topic 7.8 [ May 5, 2022 ]
Expressing ninedigitals using 9 consecutive primes
by Alexandru Petrescu
Starting from a ninedigital number N = abcdefghi we construct the following sum
S = 2a + 3b + 5c + 7d + 11e + 13f + 17g + 19h + 23i
bases being the first nine primes in ascending order and
exponents being the digits of N, from left to right
We are looking for numbers N for which S is another ninedigital.
Eight solutions emerged
1 | 249758361 | 22 + 34 + 59 + 77 + 115 + 138 + 173 + 196 + 231 | 9 terms |
---|---|---|---|
865719324 | 9 | ||
2 | 497218365 | 24 + 39 + 57 + 72 + 111 + 138 + 173 + 196 + 235 | 9 terms |
869315742 | 9 | ||
3 | 769318542 | 27 + 36 + 59 + 73 + 111 + 138 + 175 + 194 + 232 | 9 terms |
819235764 | 9 | ||
4 | 829415763 | 28 + 32 + 59 + 74 + 111 + 135 + 177 + 196 + 233 | 9 terms |
459723816 | 8 | ||
5 | 893745216 | 28 + 39 + 53 + 77 + 114 + 135 + 172 + 191 + 236 | 9 terms |
149265738 | 9 | ||
6 | 968234571 | 29 + 36 + 58 + 72 + 113 + 134 + 175 + 197 + 231 | 9 terms |
895713426 | 9 | ||
7 | 972185436 | 29 + 37 + 52 + 71 + 118 + 135 + 174 + 193 + 236 | 9 terms |
362859174 | 9 | ||
8 | 983642571 | 29 + 38 + 53 + 76 + 114 + 132 + 175 + 197 + 231 | 9 terms |
895431276 | 9 |
Topic 7.7 [ December 9, 2021 ]
Finding record “jumbled” meta_ninedigital primes
A meta_ninedigital number is defined as a normal ninedigital number
with one or more of the nine digits repeated (ad infinitum)
but must remain together in groups.
We distinguish three orders. In short they are AM9, DM9 & JM9.
Classification
Ascending meta_ninedigital (AM9) numbers
numbers of form 1(A)2(B)3(C)4(D)5(E)6(F)7(G)8(H)9(I)
Descending meta_ninedigital (DM9) numbers
numbers of form 9(A)8(B)7(C)6(D)5(E)4(F)3(G)2(H)1(I)
Jumbled meta_ninedigital (JM9) numbers
numbers of form a(A)b(B)c(C)d(D)e(E)f(F)g(G)h(H)i(I)
with {a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i} ∈ {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}
Visit my WONpage 211 to familiarise yourself with the topic
but please do come back here for another challenge.
An informal notation for a jumbled meta_ninedigital number is
Your task now is to find ever larger prime jumbled meta_ninedigitals !
Note that probable primes are fine too for very large constructions.
Just give me the starter ninedigital and the values of A up to I for shorthand display.
Maybe the values A through I make up for a beautiful sequence on its own...
Here is already an example of such a JM9 prime:
Starter ninedigital 987654123 [A=3,B=3,C=3,D=3,E=3,F=3,G=3,H=1,I=1]
or prime 99988877766655544411123 of length 23
Topic 7.6 [ December 20, 2021 ]
Reviving an old puzzle (TYCMJ 263) by Charles W. Trigg
from the Two Year College Mathematics Journal
Source 1 Index to Mathematical Problems, 1980-1984 by Stanley Rabinowitz 1992
Source 2 http://www.mathpropress.com/cmj/pages/page181.html
Question: Find a nonagonal number that is the sum of three
three-digit primes which (concatenated) together contain the nine nonzero
digits once each.
(A nonagonal number is a number of the form n(7n 5)/2 A001106).
Subquestion: Is there more than one solution ?
Who can provide me with a slick program that spews out the answer(s) ?
Or if you are not a programmer but can reach to the solution by another
method please send your answer(s) as well.
Redo the exercice but with other polygonal number formats.
And what if you use multiplication instead of the sum...
Solution by Alexandru Petrescu [ 23 december 2021 ]
The ninedigital is 149257683 and five permutations of the three three-digit primes
(149, 257, 683). The nonagonal number is 1089, for n = 18.
For multiplication instead of summation, no solution.
A natural generalization of this puzzle
Under the same conditions find polygonal numbers. I impose a condition of
increasing sequence of three 3-digit primes to avoid repeated solution
obtained by permutation of three 3-digit primes. In the table I present
ninedigital, sum of three 3-digit primes, r-gonal and rank of r-gonal sum.
Topic 7.5 [ December 28, 2021 ]
Observations around ninedigital 826453719
Alexandru Petrescu
Checking for multiples of ninedigital which become palindromic, I obtained some very interesting results.
The ninedigital with this property having the most multiplicands m (m < 1000) is 826453719 .
Pari/GP (©_pdg) |
{ nd=826453719; cnt=0; for(m=1,10000000, pal=nd*m; r=digits(pal); if(Vecrev(r)==r, cnt+=1; print(cnt," ",nd," * ",m," = ",pal)); ) } | |||
No. | Ninedigital | Multiplicand | Palindrome | Progr. substrings |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 826453719 | 11 | 9090990909 | 9090990909 |
2 | 826453719 | 28 | 23140704132 | 23140704132 |
3 | 826453719 | 65 | 53719491735 | 53719491735 |
4 | 826453719 | 209 | 172728827271 | 172728827271 |
5 | 826453719 | 308 | 254547745452 | 254547745452 |
6 | 826453719 | 407 | 336366663633 | 336366663633 |
7 | 826453719 | 506 | 418185581814 | 418185581814 |
Progression A ( 209,308,407,506 ) has a common ratio of 99 !
and in the decimal expansion of the palindrome we discover three more progressions
progression B ( 17,25,33,41 ), progression C ( 27,45,63,81 ) & progression D ( 28,47,66,85 )
to be found in the 2 digit substrings of the resp. palindromes.
Checking for the same ninedigital number multiplicands (m > 1000)
I observed a similar pattern between the following index nrs.:
No. | Ninedigital | Multiplicand | Palindrome | Progr. substrings |
---|---|---|---|---|
12 | 826453719 | 13079 | 10809188190801 | 10809188190801 |
17 | 826453719 | 25058 | 20709277290702 | 20709277290702 |
21 | 826453719 | 37037 | 30609366390603 | 30609366390603 |
25 | 826453719 | 49016 | 40509455490504 | 40509455490504 |
28 | 826453719 | 60995 | 50406544590405 | 50406544590405 |
31 | 826453719 | 72974 | 60309633690306 | 60309633690306 |
33 | 826453719 | 84953 | 70209722790207 | 70209722790207 |
35 | 826453719 | 96932 | 80109811890108 | 80109811890108 |
36 | 826453719 | 108911 | 90009900990009 | 90009900990009 |
Here the multiplicands are in arithmetic progression (common ratio = 11979 or 99*112)
and the progressions are ( 10,20,30,40,50,60,70,80,90 ), ( 80,70,60,50,40,30,20,10,00 ), ( 91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99 ) & ( 8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0 ).
Patrick observed that when we add the eight multiplicands together (from No. 12 to No. 35)
we get a palindrome namely 440044.
That is not all because the difference between the above palindrome and the last multiplicand (No. 36)
is again a palindrome namely 331133.
And now the icing on the 826453719_cake !
Definition
k-ninedigital number is a number having 9k digits, every digit from 1 to 9 appears exactly k times.
(1-ninedigital is our familiar ninedigital).
We are looking for sequences with alternating palindromes and k-ninedigital numbers (increasing k, starting from 1),
each term being integer multiple of precedent term.
No better way than to visualize it in the next table.
Palindrome | 1-ninedigital | Palindrome | 2-ninedigital | Palindrome | 3-ninedigital |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 digits | 9 digits | 12 digits | 18 digits | 20 digits | 27 digits |
90909 | 826453719 | 172728827271 | 826453719926453719 | 53719491788719491735 | 118915239766738494647823255 |
Multiplicand | 🡖 9091 🡑 | 🡖 209 🡑 | 🡖 4784689 🡑 | 🡖 65 🡑 | 🡖 2213633 🡑 |
It is a thing of beauty ! Thank you Alexandru.
Topic 7.4 [ January 30, 2022 ]
Looking for patterns in palindromes and ninedigitals
A double submission by Alexandru Petrescu
❶ Firstly Alexandru found 22 cases of a ninedigital divisible by a nine-digit palindrome.
This is consistent with the data I calculated in WONplate 114 [ August 17, 2003 ].
Index | Palindrome | * | m | = | Ninedigital |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | 156090651 | * | 3 | = | 468271953 |
2. | 157232751 | * | 3 | = | 471698253 |
3. | 165090561 | * | 3 | = | 495271683 |
4. | 165717561 | * | 3 | = | 497152683 |
5. | 175616571 | * | 3 | = | 526849713 |
6. | 132969231 | * | 4 | = | 531876924 |
7. | 189060981 | * | 3 | = | 567182943 |
8. | 198060891 | * | 3 | = | 594182673 |
9. | 246171642 | * | 3 | = | 738514926 |
10. | 123090321 | * | 6 | = | 738541926 |
11. | 123969321 | * | 6 | = | 743815926 |
12. | 249717942 | * | 3 | = | 749153826 |
13. | 264171462 | * | 3 | = | 792514386 |
14. | 132090231 | * | 6 | = | 792541386 |
15. | 264717462 | * | 3 | = | 794152386 |
16. | 275131572 | * | 3 | = | 825394716 |
17. | 279141972 | * | 3 | = | 837425916 |
18. | 145232541 | * | 6 | = | 871395246 |
19. | 145898541 | * | 6 | = | 875391246 |
20. | 297141792 | * | 3 | = | 891425376 |
21. | 132636231 | * | 7 | = | 928453617 |
22. | 136232631 | * | 7 | = | 953628417 |
Note that in lines (7. & 8.) and (21. & 22.) the palindromes are almost equal
except for a swap between two successive digits.
Palindrome1 x factor1 = Ninedigital1
Ninedigital1 x factor2 = Palindrome2
Palindrome2 x factor3 = Ninedigital|Ninedigital1 (concatenated)
Ninedigital|Ninedigital1 x factor3 = Palindrome3
with greatest Palindrome1.
There are only 10 ninedigitals (some of them having variants) which fulfil this pattern.
Many concepts blend together in this topic Ninedigitals , Palindromes , Factors , Concatenations, Multiplications
|
|
|
Topic 7.3 [ March 3, 2022 ]
Product of two ninedigitals equal to the product of their reversals
A submission by Alexandru Petrescu
Inspired by the recreational work of science writer Yakov Perelman (1882-1942)
with e.g. equation 46 x 96 = 4416 = 64 x 69 (note 64 reversal of 46 and 69 reversal of 96)
Alexandru proposes a similar problem but now with ninedigital numbers
Solve equation
A x B = Rev(A) x Rev(B)
where Rev(A) means reversal of ninedigital A, the four numbers being distinct.
He found 6 solutions
A | B | Rev(A) | Rev(B) | Product | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
124578963 | x | 639784512 | = | 369875421 | x | 215487936 | = | 79703691048421056 |
145697283 | x | 619487532 | = | 382796541 | x | 235784916 | = | 90257650264775556 |
146735982 | x | 647591823 | = | 289537641 | x | 328195746 | = | 95025022083075186 |
146983572 | x | 615947823 | = | 275389431 | x | 328749516 | = | 90534211190163756 |
157346982 | x | 647829153 | = | 289643751 | x | 351928746 | = | 101933962076166246 |
159834672 | x | 618294753 | = | 276438951 | x | 357492816 | = | 98824939045076016 |
Topic 7.2 [ March 8, 2022 ]
Dropping/Removing a digit d from a ninedigital N and multiplying
this digit with the remaining eight digits renders a palindrome P
Alexandru Petrescu found 126 solutions !
Here is the list ordered from smallest ninedigital to highest.
The only digits d that occur are 4, 6, 7 and 8.
Topic 7.1 [ March 18, 2022 ]
Two equations with ninedigitals and palindromes, nine- and/or pandigitals
Alexandru Petrescu presents four solutions !
Variant 1
Let ABCDEFGHI be a ninedigital numbers.
I propose 3 kinds of equations :
ABC + DEF + GHI = | { | palindrome (1) ninedigital (2) pandigital (3) |
where AB, DE, GH are twodigit numbers, AB < DE < GH
There are 4 solutions for equation (1), namely
No solutions exist for equations (2) and (3).
(PDG) From WONplate 22 I am not sure but might it be the start of an emerging pattern?
Alexandru came up with
Not bad at all, but I was more thinking in the direction of a palindromic pattern
using only digits 1 and 8 on the right side of the equation...
Variant 2
Let ABCDEFGHI be a ninedigital numbers.
I propose 3 kinds of equations :
ABC * DEF * GHI = | { | palindrome (1) ninedigital (2) pandigital (3) |
where ABC, DEF, GHI are threedigit numbers, ABC < DEF < GHI
There are 12 solutions for equation (1), namely
No solutions exist for equations (2) and (3).
(°) From WONplate 163 43177134 is also the area of the Pythagorean triangle
with sides 3476, 24843, 25085 (PDG).
(°°) The last one is also interesting
The Beast Number appears three times
Topic 7.14 → 159834672, 231456978, 258471936, 276438951, 357492816, 618294753, 639174852, 879654132
Topic 7.2 → 289761354, 297613548, 297613584, 297613854, 297618354, 297681354, 297861354, 298761354, 316527894, 316527948, 316527984, 316528794, 316582794, 316852794, 318652794, 367158924, 367159248, 367159284, 367159824, 367185924, 367815924, 368715924, 381652794, 386715924, 423178956, 423187956, 423189567, 423189576, 423189756, 423718956, 427318956, 437861529, 438615279, 438615297, 438615729, 438617529, 438671529, 438761529, 453967128, 462351789, 462351879, 462351897, 462357189, 462375189, 462735189, 467235189, 468915732, 469573218, 472318956, 473861529, 476235189, 486915732, 489156732, 489157326, 489157362, 489157632, 489165732, 489615732, 527861439, 528614379, 528614397, 528614739, 528617439, 528671439, 528761439, 534967128, 539467128, 539647128, 539671248, 539671284, 539671428, 539674128, 543967128, 562189743, 562197438, 562197483, 562197843, 562198743, 562819743, 568219743, 572861439, 586219743, 648915732, 649573218, 673215489, 679435812, 694357812, 694358127, 694358172, 694358712, 694375812, 694573218, 694735812, 695473218, 695732148, 695732184, 695732418, 695734218, 695743218, 697435812, 732154689, 732154869, 732154896, 732156489, 732165489, 732615489, 736215489, 742318956, 743861529, 746235189, 752861439, 763215489, 769435812, 795642138, 829761354, 831652794, 836715924, 856219743, 956421378, 956421387, 956421738, 956427138, 956472138, 956742138, 957642138, 975642138
Topic 7.1 → 286435791, 391584762, 563742891, 583741962, 874216593, 128364957, 136248759, 138527649, 158429637, 182364957, 185429637, 192563748, 194352678, 215387649, 254396817, 512847936, 531847962
[ TOP OF PAGE]