Message 11084 from Yahoo.Groups.Primenumbers

Return-Path: <d.broadhurst@...> X-Sender: d.broadhurst@... X-Apparently-To: primenumbers@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 23 Jan 2003 00:34:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 44802 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2003 00:34:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 23 Jan 2003 00:34:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n2.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.75) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Jan 2003 00:34:41 -0000 Received: from [66.218.67.152] by n2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jan 2003 00:34:40 -0000 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:34:39 -0000 To: primenumbers@yahoogroups.com Subject: 2899-digit plateau prime Message-ID: <b0ndav+lt13@...> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 1621 X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster From: "David Broadhurst <d.broadhurst@...>" <d.broadhurst@...> X-Originating-IP: 212.56.75.172 X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=35890005 X-Yahoo-Profile: djbroadhurst
According to the Onrejka-Dubner-Dubner tables at http://www.utm.edu/research/primes/lists/top_ten/ 3(5)_{1973}3 = 32*(10^1974-1)/9+1 was the largest proven plateau prime known in May 2001. In base 10, it consists of 1973 successive 5's sandwiched by a pair of 3's. It was rather easy to improve on this. OpenPfgw gave > Primality testing 4*(10^2898-1)/3-1 > [N+1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge] > Calling Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge with factored part 33.46% > 4*(10^2898-1)/3-1 is prime! which proves that 1(3)_{2897}1 = 4*(10^2898-1)/3-1 is a 2899-digit plateau prime, consisting of 2897 successive 3's sandwiched by a pair of 1's. I also investigated the following larger plateau PrPs 1(3)_{3093}1 = 4*(10^3094-1)/3-1 1(3)_{3111}1 = 4*(10^3112-1)/3-1 3(7)_{3379}3 = 34*(10^3380-1)/9-1 3(7)_{3875}3 = 34*(10^3876-1)/9-1 3(7)_{5207}3 = 34*(10^5208-1)/9-1 3(5)_{7229}3 = 32*(10^7230-1)/9+1 with factorizations of N^2-1 enabled by http://groups.yahoo.com/group/primenumbers/files/Factors/hd.zip but each appears to need more ECM work before one can achieve even a Konyagin-Pomerance proof, at 30% factorization. Some of the above might make appropriate targets for cyclotomy-assisted APRCL effort, if Jason Moxham and/or Phil Carmody ever get the urge. Patrick De Geest found that 3(7)_{10745}3 = 34*(10^10746-1)/9-1 1(3)_{15697}1 = 4*(10^15698-1)/3-1 1(3)_{17955}1 = 4*(10^17956-1)/3-1 are PrPs, but these don't seem promising either. See Patrick's page http://www.worldofnumbers.com/pdpsorted.htm for other plateau PrPs that might serve as ECPP targets, unaided by N^2-1 cyclotomy. David Broadhurst