yae9911 wrote:
> --- In primeform@yahoogroups.com, mikeoakes2@a... wrote:
> > In a message dated 08/07/04 09:35:03 GMT Daylight Time,
> nothing@a...
> > writes:
> >
> >
> > > how long will it take to find the next term in
> > >
http://www.research.att.com/projects/OEIS?Anum=A096548 ?
> > >
> > > Is there any interest or on-going activities towards finding this
> > > prime? Currently it would be at position 616 in Chris Caldwell's list.
> > > And it would certainly be one of more interesting Curios.
> > >
> >
> > At Henri Lifchitz's Top 10000 PRP page
> >
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/hlifchitz/
> > you wil see Daniel Heuer's 100,000-digit PRP
> > 10^99999+309403
> > with his comment
> > "probably the smallest PRP of 100000 digits".
> >
> > But /proving/ its primality (which is necessary to be listed on Chris
> > Caldwell's top 5000) is way beyond current technology: well over
> 10,000 years on the
> > fastest Athlon with Marcel Martin's Primo.
> >
> > -Mike Oakes
>
> Since the OEIS has tons of unproven primes I'll submit an extension
> of A096548 including a comment on the "probable" status and giving
> credit to Daniel Heuer. Which program did Daniel use and how much
> time was spent until 10^99999+309403 was found?
>
> Hugo
>
>
I had used an home seiving programme up to 2^33 and pfgw-linux. I had
scan about 8000 candidats before to find this PRP.
Daniel Heuer